beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 2014.11.04 2014가단17623

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. 8 companies, among the taxi companies in the Plaintiff’s assertion C, including the Defendant Company, among the eight taxi companies in the Plaintiff’s allegation C, are called “non-performance by the C Development Emergency Countermeasures Committee (hereinafter referred to as “non-performance by subrogation”) to oppose the amendment of the articles of incorporation of the Korea Development Countermeasures Committee to the effect that E, the current president of the DF, who is a police officer

A) Around January 20, 2014, a meeting was held. Non-Subrogation ought to take the weak points of E in order to prevent the amendment of the articles of incorporation at the meeting above. In the past, the statement “written statement” (hereinafter referred to as “written statement”) sent by the Plaintiff to the Defendant Chairperson.

A) A written statement shall be used. If the Plaintiff is at issue upon disclosure of the written statement, the Plaintiff shall bear the civil and criminal liability arising therefrom. On January 22, 2014, the Non-Subrogation’s written statement was prepared on the premise that the Plaintiff’s initial statement was non-disclosure and attached to the written statement or explained the details thereof to the Plaintiff. From September 7, 2013, the Plaintiff was serving as a taxi driver at Fsi and Fsi representative G from September 7, 2013 to the said written statement, and the Plaintiff was unable to enter G’s position because it was difficult for the Plaintiff to enter the said written statement, the Plaintiff was forced to retire from the Fsi on January 24, 2014 at his request, and the Plaintiff’s written statement was prepared on the premise that the Plaintiff’s non-disclosure was made on the premise that the Plaintiff’s damages incurred to the Plaintiff were incurred to the Plaintiff 2000 won or more due to the disclosure of the written statement to the Plaintiff’s 2000 won or more.

2. The plaintiff's assertion of judgment is that the plaintiff suffers disadvantage by disclosing the plaintiff's written statement to the appeal, etc.