However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 23:09 on June 14, 2016, the Defendant received 112 reports from E located in Yangsan-si, E, and obstructed the legitimate performance of duties by police officers as to the maintenance of public order and order by assaulting the public security by assaulting the police officers, under the influence of alcohol to request for presentation of identification cards from G and H affiliated policemen of the F District Police Station of Yangsan-si, the Defendant called “I will see it, I will not see it, I will see it, I will see it, I will see it, I will see it, I will see it, I will see it, I will see it, I will see it, I will see it, I will see that I will see it, I will see it, I will see it, I will see it, and I will see it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to G and I

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (the consideration given to favorable circumstances, such as the fact that the person is against the situation, the fact that there is no previous conviction for the same kind, and the fact that the damaged police officer deposited 525,500 won