A. On July 9, 2014, the Defendant, based on the executory exemplification of the payment order of the Daejeon District Court 2014Ra96, Seogjin-si, the Daejeon District Court 201, Seogjin-si, Seoul District Court 201, carried out compulsory execution on each of the goods listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “each of the goods of this case”).

B. However, each of the instant items is a thing that was transferred to the Plaintiff on November 30, 2013, because the gold sump truck rental fee and oil price of KRW 120,000 from March 2012, the gold sump truck rental fee and oil price were not paid.

[Reasons for Recognition] Each entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3 (including paper numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the facts of the above recognition, each of the instant items is owned by the Plaintiff, a third party, not a stock company, which is the debtor, and thus, the compulsory execution against each of the instant items shall be dismissed.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.