2. It is recognized that the defendant made a confession of all crimes and repents his mistake.

However, in light of the forms and methods of each of the crimes of this case, the crime is bad, the amount of fraud exceeds 28 million won in total, but the damage has not been recovered, the defrauded was not agreed with the victims, the defrauded was used as a gold at the Internet gambling site, there is no change of circumstances that may otherwise determine the court below's age, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of each of the crimes of this case, and the scope of recommended sentencing guidelines for the enactment of the sentencing guidelines by the Supreme Court after considering all of the sentencing conditions as shown in the arguments of this case, including the circumstances after the crime, etc., it is not recognized that the sentence of the court below is unfair because it is too inappropriate.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. As such, the Defendant’s appeal is dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit, and is so decided as per Disposition (Article 25(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that the Defendant’s appeal is dismissed under the foregoing paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the following grounds: (i) the Defendant’s appeal No. 2-A-1 of the criminal history column 2-1 of the judgment of the court below was omitted as of May 26, 2015; and (ii) the “ratna” of the three parallels is obvious that it is a clerical error of “However,” and thus, it is corrected to add