However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the drinking value.

As such, the Defendant enticed the victim D and received 330,000 won in total from the victim and obtained pecuniary benefits equivalent to the above amount.

2. The Defendant asserted that, at the time of the instant case, two females, who were themselves and accompanying themselves, were moving the Defendant into the age club in order to raise their awards, thereby refusing to pay the drinking value, and that it is unreasonable to pay the drinking value, and that there was an intent and ability to pay the drinking value at the time of the instant case to the age club.

The records of this case are as follows: (a) the defendant has been recognized by the records of this case, i.e., that he had drinking together with two women prior to misunderstanding in Cata club (the defendant asserts that he had paid his drinking value even at the above frequency); and (b) the victim had been aware of the above two women, and the victim had taken the body with them, and (b) the defendant and two women have moved to the place where they had been drinking for beer while trying to beer, but the above women had been actively drinking both the defendant, and even even if the victim was able to drink, 2 women want to drink together with the defendant (see D's testimony); (c) even though the defendant ordered both women, the above two women have been sent to the defendant without drinking or playing outside the defendant, etc.