2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. The Plaintiff and the Defendant completed the marriage report on February 22, 1988. The Plaintiff and the Defendant concluded a conciliation agreement with the Defendant that “The Plaintiff and the Defendant divorced, and the Defendant pays 25 million won to the Plaintiff as a division of property” on September 24, 2013 by filing a lawsuit of divorce, etc. against the Defendant (Resan Family Court 2013rdle16035).

B. Meanwhile, upon receiving a request from the Defendant to lend money to the Defendant, the Plaintiff Lee Dong-dong and Lee Dong-dong and the Defendant Lee Dong-dong and filed a lawsuit claiming the return of the loan (Seoul District Court Decision 2006Da13528, Jun. 29, 2007) by asserting that D loaned money to the Defendant, which was KRW 10 million on Jan. 7, 2002, KRW 200,000 on April 8, 2002, KRW 8 million on April 11, 2002, and KRW 40 million on May 24, 2002, and the Busan District Court dismissed the claim by D on June 29, 2007, and the judgment became final and conclusive at that time.

[Ground of recognition] Class A evidence Nos. 1, 2, Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 3, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff's assertion and determination shall lend money from the defendant C and D as the defendant's personal taxi purchase fund to the defendant, and the amount of KRW 30 million on April 23, 2002 shall be the same year.

5. 3. Claim that each lent 30 million won to .

The testimony of the witness C alone is insufficient to acknowledge the fact that the plaintiff lent a total of KRW 60 million to the defendant, as alleged above, as stated in the above evidence No. 3-1 and No. 3-2, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge the above assertion.

Therefore, the Plaintiff’s assertion is difficult to accept.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.