However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On August 27, 2016, at around 13:25, the Defendant: (a) was suffering from usual e (n, 6 years of age) from the Defendant’s wife E (n, 6 years of age) who was suffering from a multi-household 401, which is a multi-household in Pyeongtaek-si, Pyeongtaek-si; (b) had the Defendant feel suicide impulse at the house in a timely manner; (c) had the Defendant left the house with a view to keeping him from suicide shock; and (d) had the Plaintiff left the house immediately after being stored inside the house while using the gas park, with a fire attached in the same manner to stop the use of the gas park; (d) had the Defendant attempted to extinguish the string building owned by the victim F (n, 78 years of age) by setting fire in the same manner, but did not have committed any attempted crime by extinguishing only a part of the market by a fire captain dispatched after receiving a report from the residents.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of response statutes upon request for on-site photographs and investigative cooperation;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Articles 174 and 164 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of criminal facts;

1. Mitigation of attempted punishment: Articles 25(2) and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Since a crime of attempted sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution is an attempted crime for the reason of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, the crime of fire prevention, which does not apply to the sentencing criteria, is a crime detrimental to public safety and peace, is a dangerous crime that may cause serious damage to life and property of a large

However, the defendant's mistake is recognized, the defendant's attempted crime is favorable, and the defendant has been hospitalized in a long time hospital for treatment of depression after the crime of this case, and the defendant's intention of rehabilitation is different from the circumstances, such as age and character of the defendant, motive, means and consequence of the crime of this case, and the conditions of sentencing specified in the arguments of this case, such as the circumstances after the crime of this case, shall be determined by the order.