beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.11.10 2016고정752

청소년보호법위반

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who works as an employee at a general restaurant in the name of ‘D' in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, as an employee.

In spite of the fact that no one sells drugs harmful to juveniles, etc. to juveniles, the Defendant sold alcoholic beverages equivalent to KRW 62,00,000, such as 1 disease, 2 disease, 3 disease, and 62,00, to five persons, including juveniles E (the age of 16, South) in the above restaurant on January 23, 2016.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of the witness F, G, H, E, I, and J;

1. Each statement;

1. On-site photographs (the defendant and his defense counsel argued that the two initial resident registration certificates of the defendant, which the defendant first entered, were examined as adults, and the remaining three persons were confirmed. However, five juveniles stated that there was no demand from the investigative agency to present their identification cards on the day of the instant case. The above juveniles do not seem to have any special circumstances to make a false statement, and considering the enforcement process of the instant case, the situation inside the restaurant, the testimony of the police officer dispatched, etc., the credibility of the statement is recognized (F appears in this court as a witness, and H and E are always adult identification cards, and H and E are allowed to present their identification cards at all times, and I used their identification cards to go to the instant restaurant in advance from E and went to the instant restaurant, and they did not request them to present their identification cards. However, it cannot be readily concluded that the first two adult persons did not directly present their identification cards because they did not request the witness to present their identification cards.

Therefore, the above argument by the defendant and his defense counsel is not accepted. The above argument is applied to the law.