The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

The court below acknowledged the facts as stated in its reasoning based on the adopted evidence, and determined that the prescription period for the Plaintiff’s possession of the instant land was completed on December 31, 1993, since the Plaintiff’s father D, at least from December 31, 1973, occupied the instant land and succeeded to the Plaintiff’s possession, and it cannot be deemed that the possession was the possession of the Plaintiff, or that the presumption of possession was reversed.

In light of the relevant legal principles and records, the fact-finding and judgment of the court below are just, and contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, there are no errors in violation of logical

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed, and the costs of appeal are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.