2. The Korean Criminal Procedure Act, which takes the trial-oriented principle and the principle of directness, has a unique area for sentencing determination, and there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared to the first instance court, and the first instance court’s sentencing does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect it.

(See Supreme Court en banc Decision 2015Do3260 Decided July 23, 2015). In the instant case, there is no particular change in the sentencing conditions compared to the lower court’s judgment. As such, in full view of the following: (a) the circumstance and circumstance of a drunk driving; (b) the degree of blood alcohol concentration; (c) the distance of a drunk driving; (d) no criminal record other than once a fine is imposed; (b) the person who is sentenced to imprisonment without prison labor or heavier punishment may be dismissed from the company; (c) the person who shall support a spouse with poor health conditions; and (d) the Defendant’s age and an environment of happiness; and (e) all the sentencing conditions indicated in the arguments and records of the instant case, the lower court’

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit.