2. The judgment of the defendant shows an attitude against the defendant to recognize each of the crimes of this case, and the extent of damage or damage of each of the crimes is not much serious. However, each of the crimes of this case is disadvantageous to the defendant, such as the defendant thefts or steals property of many unspecified victims over several occasions, and assaults or commits an act of destroying property or interfering with duties, etc. without any special reason, and it was committed against many victims within a short period of up to one month, up to the time during which the victims were committed, or failed to recover damage to the victims, the defendant has been punished several times for the same crimes, and each of the crimes of this case was committed by the defendant several times on May 19, 2016, by interfering with the execution of official duties at the Busan District Court on September 1, 2017, which was sentenced to one year and four months for which the defendant had been sentenced to imprisonment and was committed in whole during the period after the execution of the punishment was completed.

In full view of the above favorable circumstances and other circumstances, such as the defendant’s age, sex, environment, family relationship, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances that are the conditions for sentencing as shown in the pleadings, even if considering all favorable circumstances for the defendant, it cannot be deemed unfair because the court below’s punishment is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.