주거이전비등
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Details of the disposition
The defendant is the implementer of the Gangseo-gu Busan Metropolitan Government project for the development of the So-called So-called So-called So-called So-called So-called So-called So-called So-called the Project and the project area in question (hereinafter referred to as the "instant project"), which is promoted in approximately 1,886,00 square meters in Busan Metropolitan City, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, and Dong-do,
On December 10, 2010, the Plaintiff inherited 2/7 shares of each of the following: (a) the number No. 407 square meters in the Gangseo-gu Busan Metropolitan City, which was owned by the deceased B due to the death of the father B; (b) the number No. 407 square meters in Gangseo-gu, Busan Metropolitan City (hereinafter “instant building”) and the same lot number No. 69.42 square meters in a single-story house (hereinafter “instant building”); and (c) the same lot number No. Na Dong-dong, where buildings not registered are located, the Plaintiff inherited 7/7 square meters in each of the “72 square meters in each of the instant warehouse” (hereinafter “instant warehouse”).
The progress of the instant project is as follows.
On July 12, 2012, the Defendant, on December 14, 2012, announced the residents’ public inspection announcement for the designation of the Busan Edele City waterfront (hereinafter “instant announcement”) on December 14, 2012, on May 16, 2013, announced the announcement of the plan for the designation of the Busan Edele City Waterfront Development Project, etc. on September 14, 2013, the Defendant requested the Plaintiff to consult on compensation related to the instant project on November 14, 2013. Accordingly, the Plaintiff and the remaining co-owners of the instant building agreed on the payment of compensation, etc. for the instant building and entered into a contract on the distribution of compensation amount, etc. thereafter.
On May 4, 2015, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for the selection of a person subject to relocation measures regarding the instant project. On July 16, 2015, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff of the results of the examination that the Plaintiff was excluded from the person subject to relocation measures (hereinafter “instant disposition”).
The plaintiff.