2. If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 10,000 won.

On May 12, 2015, the Defendant: (a) at the D Women’s Rest Office in Daejeon-gu Daejeon Metropolitan Government, the Defendant considered that “F and E were frighted for three hours from female frighten in women and frighten; (b) F and E were in women’s frighten relationship for more than five years; and (c) made a public speech to the employees of the company that “F and E were in women’s frighten relationship for more than five years,” thereby undermining the honor of the victim F.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness F and G;

1. Partial statement of the witness H in the court;

1. Written complaint, each recording book (I, J, K);

1. A fact-finding certificate;

1. On May 12, 2015, the present situation (A) of the five-month period (hereinafter “instant story”) (hereinafter “instant story”) by a witness G, at the D Women’s Rest room in the building C around May 12, 2015, the Defendant impairs the victim’s reputation, such as a criminal fact, to H, etc.

In full view of the following facts: (a) the witness made a clear statement that he was doing so; (b) the witness made a statement to the effect that he respondeded to the instant talk from the Defendant at the beginning of May 2015; (c) K, the Defendant’s work partner, took the instant talk from H around the beginning of May 2015; and (d) the Defendant’s work partner, I and J, the Defendant’s work partner, directly taken the instant talk from the Defendant; and (e) the Defendant’s work partner, directly taken the instant talk, the Defendant’s criminal facts of this case are found guilty).

1. Relevant Article 307 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order seems to have seen the instant talk in the process of handling grievances related to sexual indecent conduct in the workplace.

However, in addition to the date, time, and place of criminal facts, the defendant seems to have made several times of the instant talks with the workplace rent at other dates and places, and the victim suffered severe mental pain due to insult and sense of shame, and the victim's damage has not been recovered.