beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2019.05.22 2018고단408 (1)

폭행치상

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

3.2

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 11, 2017, at around 00:05, the Defendant used the “C” way in the Gumi-si B, the Defendant used the victim D (the age of 25) who was fluorily fluored and fluored in the pet dog to read “if the pet dog carries only three bluorine bags, he shall have three bluorine bluorine bags.” As a result of a pet dog as a matter of a pet dog, the Defendant brued the victim by hand and fluored the victim’s fluor.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of police suspect regarding D;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. The main sentence of Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Taking into account the following circumstances: (a) the reason for sentencing under Article 62-2(1) of the Social Service and Criminal Act: (b) the Defendant’s age, occupation, and basic living care recipient; (c) the background leading to the crime including the victim’s attitude; (d) the criminal records; and (e) the fact that the co-defendant was unable to obtain an opportunity for reconciliation because