However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 02:30 on November 1, 2014, the Defendant: (a) was under influence of alcohol in front of the c’s c’s headline, and was reported by 112, and was urged to return home from the E officer belonging to the Gyeonggi-Pacific Police Station D Zone D Zone for the Gyeonggi-gu Police Station, which was called for, and (b) expressed that the above E should have sprinked “sprinked out why sprinks grow,” and committed assaulting the above E on the hand floor of the knive hand, such as having spacked the knick part of the said E at one time, and smuggling the breast part of the chest.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties on site mobilization and protective measures of police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statement to E;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor concerning the crime;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that the accused is guilty of his/her mistake and has no record of punishment other