The punishment of the lower court (two months of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, 80 hours of an order to attend a sexual assault treatment lecture, and 3 years of an employment restriction order for children and juveniles-related institutions, etc. and welfare facilities for disabled persons) is too unfluent and unreasonable.

Judgment

There is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared with the original judgment because new sentencing materials have not been submitted in the trial, and comprehensively taking account of all the reasons for sentencing indicated in the records of this case, it cannot be deemed that the lower court’s sentencing has exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion because it is too unhued.

In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.