교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for a period of one and half years.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a motor vehicle in the camp Habrid.
On September 7, 2017, the Defendant came to turn to the left at the right-hand side of the original bus terminal at the intersection of the wharf located in 192 as Seowon-si, Won-si, and the right-hand turn to the right-hand turn.
In this case, the driver of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle after checking the signal of the person engaged in driving the motor vehicle.
Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and neglected to make a left turn to the right turn and violated the signal, and caused the victim F. (51) who was driving the CA110B Ora to go beyond the front side of the suspect car to go beyond the front side of the vehicle by driving the CA110-B Ora in accordance with the straight line from the front side of the road.
As a result, the Defendant caused the victim to suffer an injury during the period of treatment due to the occupational negligence above, which caused the victim to be in an obscure state by suffering from an injury during the two sofacing softening sofacsing and the two sofaculing sofacs.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Each police statement made with respect to G and H;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on the investigation of actual conditions, on-site photographs, diagnosis certificates, and each investigation report;
1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents under the relevant Act concerning criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act;
1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended execution (Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act provides that there are circumstances unfavorable to the defendant, such as the nature of the crime and the fact that the crime is very heavy in light of the method and result, etc., however, there is no criminal conviction against the defendant, and it appears that the vehicle operated by the defendant at the time of the traffic accident in this case has been covered by the comprehensive motor vehicle insurance, and that considerable compensation for the