However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On December 26, 2006, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 500,000,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) at a wooden branch of the Gwangju District Court on September 4, 2008, a fine of KRW 500,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) at a wooden branch of the Gwangju District Court on September 4, 2008, and a fine of KRW 1,50,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) at the wooden branch of the Gwangju District Court on

On May 29, 2018, at around 20:40, the Defendant driven a Fone Starsch Rexn car in the state of alcohol alcohol concentration of approximately 0.095% from the 1km section from the Mat Parking Lot located in B of Naju to the front road of the E elementary school located in D of Naju.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. Notification of the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. Inquiries about the results of crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Previous conviction: Application of a written inquiry and a summary order, such as criminal history;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on the Observation, etc. of Protection and Order to provide community service, order to attend lectures, and order to attend lectures;

A. Unfavorable conditions: The Defendant again committed the instant crime even though he/she was punished four times due to drinking driving, including his/her previous convictions in all judgment, and the blood alcohol concentration was high;

(b) favorable conditions: The defendant's recognition of the crime of this case and reflects his mistake, and there is no record of punishment exceeding the fine;

C. The Defendant’s punishment was determined in consideration of the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, circumstances before and after the commission of the crime, and other various sentencing conditions specified in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, which were revealed in the records of the instant case.