국가유공자 및 보훈보상대상자 비해당결정처분취소
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On March 6, 2001, the Plaintiff entered the Army and was discharged from military service on September 13, 2001.
B. On June 22, 2001, the Plaintiff, after being discharged from military service, filed an application for registration of a person who rendered distinguished services to the State on the ground that “the escape certificate of a conical signboard escape No. 4-5 in the memorial signboard escape certificate No. 5 in the도요, No. 5 in the 2001 to be discharged from military hospital after being hospitalized in a military hospital,” and subsequently filed an application for registration of a person who rendered distinguished services to the State on December 18, 2001.
C. On October 4, 2013, the Plaintiff filed an application for re-registration of a person of distinguished service to the State on the same application basis.
On February 5, 2014, following the deliberation of the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement, the defendant is deemed to be a person of distinguished service to the State under the Act on the Honorable Treatment of and Support for Persons, etc. of Distinguished Service to the State (hereinafter "Act on Persons of Distinguished Service to the State") on the ground that the plaintiff's application was different in the performance of official duties under the Act on the Support for Persons of Distinguished Service to the State (hereinafter "Act on Persons of Distinguished Service to the State") and determined to be eligible for veteran's compensation, on February 5, 2014, for the reason that it is not judged that the previous ability of the plaintiff was verified for the 4-5 in his/her application, and that an injury directly related to national defense, security, or education and training during his/her military service was not verified, and that the number of injury was aggravated due to repeated training and performance of his/her duties, and thus, he/she constitutes a person eligible for veteran's compensation. On the other hand, it is found that the previous injury was proved and not directly related to national security.