공직자윤리법위반
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) by the court below is too unreasonable as the punishment (amounting to five million won) imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.
2. In full view of the various matters, which are the conditions for sentencing in the trial of the judgment party (the fact that a member of the Gu, who is a member of the Gu, has trusted in the name of the branch without selling or trusting the shares owned by him/her in relation to his/her duties, and is not well-grounded in the process of committing the crime, the fact that there is only one previous conviction of a fine, confession and reflects, etc.) and the applicable sentences, the judgment of the court below is deemed to belong within the reasonable scope of discretion, and there is a change in the conditions for sentencing when it comes to the trial of the party
Considering the fact that it cannot be seen, the lower court’s sentence is too unreasonable due to the fact that the Defendant’s above assertion is without merit.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.