근로기준법위반
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is the operator of Bupyeong-gu, Busan Metropolitan City C, who operates beauty and beauty business by making use of one full-time worker, and from March 26, 2012 at the same place of business
4. In the absence of an agreement between the parties on the extension of the due date and payment, the amount of KRW 1,17,060, total of KRW 259,69,690 in March 2012 and KRW 1,117,060 in April 2012, which was retired after having worked until March 27, 2012, was not paid within 14 days from the date of retirement, which is the date on which
2. The judgment is a crime falling under Article 109(1) of the Labor Standards Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 109(2) of the same Act. According to the records, it is recognized that the above victim submitted to this court a written agreement stating that the victim does not want punishment after a summary order was requested. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.