beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2014.04.11 2014고합61

살인

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for fifteen years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Around 23:00 on February 6, 2014, the Defendant started to go through E, one’s own living together, a female of the victim and E, at the house of the Dong-gu Seoul Central District Office C-based multi-household house 205 (hereinafter referred to as the “victim D, 28 years old”) and went through a division of personnel with the victim and the victim and E, while drinking together with the victim and E, the victim took a little humbling and talked with the victim, and the victim took a humbling and talked with the victim. Accordingly, the victim humbling the Defendant outside of the house, and the Defendant hump (18.5cm a day-car 1cm knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knif).

On February 7, 2014, at around 01:27, the Defendant entered the following as nine times the victim’s left chest, the left chest, the left chest, the right chest, and the left arms, such as the Defendant discovered the kitchen knife and tried to take it away from the Defendant, and the victim’s left chest with the above kitchen knife so that they can be operated only once. On the street of the above multi-household house, the Defendant entered the following as “nine times”, and on the on-site identification report and the report on the result of the changeer’s investigation, the Defendant also found that the victim’s body fnife or bee in the body of the victim.

However, the defendant asserts that he has reached only twice the victim, and in F and E also police police, the witness stated that the defendant was faced with the victim twice, and the victim was also damaged by the victim's body, such as the 8th century's own window from the victim's body, but the autopsy stated that there is a possibility of dispute or defense caused by damage to the victim's body, and that there is a possibility that the dispute or defense may occur in the course of defense even in other 1 group.

In light of these points, it is difficult to conclude that the number of upper parts discovered from the body of the victim corresponds to that of the defendant's attack.