2. The fact that the Defendant made a confession and reflects on the instant crime, and that the Defendant agreed to pay the amount of damage to the victim in installments at the trial is favorable.

However, in full view of the fact that the Defendant had already been sentenced to a fine or imprisonment with prison labor as a crime of fraud, and again repeated crimes of this case, the amount of defraudation reaches five million won, and that it is difficult to deem that the Defendant agreed with the victim and agreed to have been recovered from full damage, but it is difficult to deem that the Defendant was completely recovered from full damage, and other various sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments, such as the Defendant’s age, family environment, and circumstances before and after the crime, the lower court’s sentence against the Defendant

3. If so, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.