On February 15, 2018, the Defendant: (a) placed a vehicle in front of “C cafeteria” located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-do on February 15, 2018; and (b) made a conversation with the people, the Defendant 390

"Abreging City expenses, and drinking nine times the victim's face face was taken by drinking, and the victim was satisfying for about 14 days in need of medical treatment.

On June 22, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 04:55 on June 22, 2018, the Defendant: (b) divided the first race of the above residence in order to interview the victim, whose mother is aware of the whereabouts of the Defendant’s mother, in the outer third village of the Defendant in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu; (c) but (d) on June 22, 2018, damaged the Defendant by selling the entrance door of the above residence, which is the victim, with the repair cost of KRW 40,000.

Summary of Evidence

[2018 Highest 390]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Investigation report (to hear statements from wooden persons and reporting thereon);

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. A damaged photograph (2018 Highest 2003);

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged articles;

1. Relevant Article 257 of the Criminal Act, Articles 257 (1) and 366 of the Criminal Act, and choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Concurrent Crimes is a crime of this case where: (a) the defendant d's act of belbling expenses to the victim D while under the influence of alcohol without any particular reason; (b) the defendant d's face at hand; and (c) the defendant d's external third village of the victim F's house was divided into the first letter, but the defendant d's external third village of the defendant d's house, but there was no answer; (d) the defendant d's act of violence is strong in light of the course and form of the crime; and (e) the nature and form of the crime is not good; and (e) there is no agreement with the victims or no recovery from damage until now, and thus, the crime of this case is very serious.