beta
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.03.24 2015누59688

부당해고구제재심판정취소

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal, including the costs of supplementary participation, are all borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

The court's explanation of this case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, citing this case in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(1) The court of first instance that rejected the Plaintiff’s claim, even if all evidence submitted in the first instance and the first instance court are examined, the grounds alleged in the appeal by the Plaintiff are not different from the contents alleged by the Plaintiff in the first instance court, and the court of first instance that rejected the Plaintiff’s claim is justifiable. Accordingly, the court of first instance that dismissed the Plaintiff’s claim as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and it is so decided as per Disposition