except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On April 9, 2015, the Defendant: (a) heard that the victim C(the age of 66) was not a good story for the Defendant; and (b) reported the victim from the playter in the Gungdong apartment in Busan-gu, Busan-gu, Busan-do around April 9, 2015; and (c) caused the damage of the victim to the end of the offline and the end of the offline that requires approximately seven weeks of treatment for the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The application of C’s written statement, written complaint, written diagnosis, and written diagnosis and treatment to C;

1. Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, the choice of imprisonment;

1. The suspension of execution of sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is to suspend the execution of imprisonment with prison labor, taking into account the following factors: (a) the grounds for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act [the scope of recommending punishment] general injury (the scope of recommending punishment]; (b) the mitigation area (two to one year); (c) the reduction area (including a special mitigation), the reduction area (including a serious effort to recover damage); or (d) the recovery of considerable damage (the decision of sentencing