A. The lower court’s sentencing is too inappropriate.

B. The lower court’s sentencing is too uncomfortable.

2. Considering the fact that the nature of the instant crime is not good, and that the Defendant again committed the instant crime even though he had committed several violent crimes, strict punishment against the Defendant is necessary.

However, considering the fact that the defendant repents his mistake, the fact that the injured party does not want the punishment of the defendant by agreement with the injured party, and the age, sex and environment of the defendant, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the court below is deemed appropriate and is too heavy or unreasonable, and thus, the above argument by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit.

3. In conclusion, since the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.