B and D Partnership shall be punished by a fine of 2,000,000 won.

Defendant

B If the above fine is not paid.

Defendant

D Partnership is a juristic person established for the purpose of medical services, etc. in the J of Si-si, and Defendant A is an oriental medical doctor working at the K oriental medical hospital established by the said juristic person and Defendant B is an employee of the said oriental medical hospital.

1. Defendant A and B’s joint criminal administration Defendants from September 14, 2012 at the same time

9. From the above oriental medical hospital until December 21, 200, Defendant A is called Mariri, and Qari.

L who wants to provide legal treatment provides Defendant B with a medical treatment “Apppine Hawhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

In accordance with the law, the treatment was conducted.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to conduct a non-licensed practice.

2. Defendant B: (a) around September 27, 2012, the Defendant: (b) was hospitalized at the above oriental medical hospital on the part of the Ma, who was hospitalized by the Ma from the Ma, who was enrolled by the Mazin and Mazin; and

The medical treatment under the law was conducted without a license.

3. The Defendant, who is his employee, committed a violation as described in the above paragraphs 1 and 2 with respect to the Defendant’s business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of Defendant B in the first trial record;

1. Legal statement of the witness L;

1. Statements of witnesses M in the second protocol of trial;

1. Some description of each police suspect examination protocol against Defendant A;

1. Investigation report (to make telephone conversations investigation with N of Witnesses);

1. Statement of the claim for medical expenses, and statement of the claim for medical expenses;

1. In addition to the investigation report-medical records [The above evidence shows that the "act of cutting down the neck and bones as shown in the crime, etc." as stated in the judgment below is not merely a mere procedure for recovery of the cryp, but a considerable physical shock against the body, which led to the treatment act (the defendant A also committed the act of the defendant B in the treatment cryp).