However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On May 18, 2016, at the D convenience store operated by the victim C in Ansan-si B around 06:36, the Defendant carried out one set of proton 1,500 won at the market price displayed in the store using the gaps in which the surveillance of the victim was neglected, and one set of proton 1 at the market price equivalent to KRW 3,500 at the market price of KRW 4,200 at the market price and 6,900 at the market price.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A simple statement in C;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on photographs by cutting down a receipt or CCTV course;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution [Scope of Sentencing Recommendations] - Class I (Crime of thiefthing Articles, etc.) mitigation area (one to six months) for general property - Special mitigation area: He/she shall not be punished [Determination of a sentence] - The circumstances favorable to him/her: The defendant acknowledges his/her mistake, his/her damage is not severe, his/her damage is not severe, his/her agreement with the victim, and his/her unfavorable circumstances: The defendant has a record of being punished for each fine in 2012 and 2015 for larceny.