When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

No person shall make a false indication of origin or make an indication that may cause confusion as to the origin.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while operating the restaurant “D” in Ansan-si, provided the country of origin from May 28, 2014, and June 4, 2014 to E, and provided the same restaurant with 10 km in total, 20 km in Korea, and 10 km in total, and 20 km in total, on the bulletin board located in the above restaurant, indicated the country of origin for culture-related kimchi in Korea.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A written confirmation, evidence of breach of origin;

1. Investigation report (Attachment of Statement of Trade), investigation report (Attachment of purchase records of maim Kim), investigation report (Binding force filing), defendant asserts that there is no criminal intent since he/she received from a food materials supply company the kimchi in Korea and did not confirm it. According to the records of the judgment of the same kind, according to images of evidence of violation of origin, the defendant stated that the country of origin of maim Kim in the packing boxes of maim Kim that was supplied by him/her was in China, and the defendant expressed that he/she was punished by a fine for the same crime by indicating that the country of origin of maim Kim in July 27, 201 was domestically in Korea. According to the above facts of recognition, according to the facts charged in this case, the defendant can be sufficiently recognized, and thus the defendant's assertion cannot be accepted) can not be accepted.

1. Relevant Articles 15 and 6 (2) 1 of the Act on Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products and the Selection of Punishment for Criminal Facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;