2. The judgment of the defendant is against the defendant's confession of the facts of the crime, the defendant is recognized to have repaid some part of the amount of damage (I.5.6 million won, M 2.0 million won) to the victim I and M, but the crime of this case is deemed to have been committed by deceiving six victims for a period of two years and by deceiving them, and the crime of this case is committed by deceiving them total of 27,9750,00 won. In light of the form of the act of deception and the amount of damage, the nature of the crime is serious, the most damage amount has not been repaid up to the trial, the defendant has a history of being punished once as the same crime, and other various circumstances, which are the conditions of sentencing as shown in the records and arguments of this case, it is not recognized that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.