However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 11:00 on February 22, 2019, the Defendant sent E-mail messages to the Defendant, such as that “A victim D (here, 38 years of age was employed unlawfully in the welfare center without having taken an examination by the Defendant’s wife” before the preceding day, and sent the Defendant an E-mail message to the Defendant, the Defendant, on his hand, sent the victim’s face of agriculture, which is an object dangerous to the victim’s face, with the victim’s face, with the victim’s bomb, and with the victim’s face as soon as possible.” On the other hand, the Defendant continued to commit a threat.

As a result, the Defendant carried dangerous things with the victim and inflicted injury on sugars, etc. with no one in which there is no one in which the victim needs to be treated for about three weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (i.e., the fact that the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant by mutual consent with the victim, and the fact that the victim does not have any previous conviction or criminal record exceeding the fine, etc.);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (ney consideration for repeated circumstances favorable to living in the future);

1. Probation under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;