2. The facts that the Defendant made a confession of all of the instant crimes and reflects the mistake are considered favorable to the Defendant.

However, the crime of this case is committed in light of the method, frequency, contents, etc. of the crime committed by the defendant at night using a cresh in 23 times, etc., theft of victims' goods from clothes, purchase of stolen credit cards with the stolen credit card, and not a moving-in report following the moving of his residence even though he is liable for military service, and the crime of this case is not good, and there are several criminal records including the defendant who was sentenced to criminal punishment for larceny, and the defendant committed the crime of this case during the period of repeated crime due to larceny, etc., it is not yet recovered from damage, and all other sentencing conditions in the argument of this case such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, family environment, etc., the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is not accepted.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.