교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
1. Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) by the Defendant is a person engaging in driving a rocketing or other car.
On June 25, 2020, the Defendant driven the said car with a blood alcohol level of 0.101% 0.10%, while under the influence of alcohol around 21:40 on June 25, 2020, and led C front-down road to D Schools from the direction of the Office of Education.
The Defendant had a duty of care to properly operate the steering gear, accurately operating the steering gear, and to safely proceed by adjusting speed in advance, as the Defendant was behind a Fchip car driven by the victim E (the age of 51) in the same direction.
Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, neglected to stop in the signal line due to negligence while driving, received the backper of the passenger vehicle in front of the Defendant’s passenger vehicle, and let the franchis get back of the G driving which was in the atmosphere of the signal in front.
Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim E, such as knee and knee in need of approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and tensions and tensions in the part of unknown part, and injury to the victim I (the 25 years old), who is the passenger of the said franchise-based car, in need of medical treatment for about two weeks of age, and suffered injury to the victim J (ma, 46 years old) such as feas and tensions in need of medical treatment for about two weeks of age.
2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (driving) driven a B rocketing car with the blood alcohol concentration of about 0.101% from the section of approximately 1.1km to the road in front of the KS at the time from the front of the KS at the time in the same time as the preceding paragraph to the front of the same city.
Summary of Evidence
1. The police statement of the defendant E in his court statement;
1. On-site surveys, photographs, drinking control results, notification on the results of drinking driving control, and the table of requests for appraisal;