However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On September 6, 2019, the Defendant: (a) on the street in front of the “C” located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu; (b) on September 21, 2019, the Defendant: (c) reported 112 and sent “two sons” to the police officers affiliated with the D District District District D District of the Ulsan-nam Police Station, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-do, where he was called out, opened several posts of patrols on the said E while taking a bath to the said E; (d) opened the posts of patrols on the front of the said patrols; and (e) opened the said E with the head and hand of the said patrols.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of F’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor concerning the crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Consideration of the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, including the fact that there exists a record of being sentenced to a fine several times due to the obstruction of performance of official duties and the crime of injury, etc., and that the crimes are pened;