beta
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2018.04.05 2018고정16

주거침입

Text

A defendant shall be punished by two million won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant and the victim are adjoining neighbors.

On July 18, 2017, the defendant found that there was a 1104 entrance door, where the victim D resides in around 21:00 and the 105-dong 1104-dong Da-gun of Busan, the defendant's apartment house C, 105-dong 1104.

The Defendant took a bath to the victim who was in his house due to an unsound emotional testimony and his or her his or her his or her father’s wife, such as “the young shall die of the same year, bad years, and Chewing years.”

Therefore, the victim was forced to open the entrance door of the victim, but the defendant was not forced to leave the entrance door of the victim, but was installed at the small door door door door below the entrance, and then the window was installed by force.

The defendant continued to put his hand, which is a part of his body, into the body, puts his bath, and spits spit into the window, thereby harming the peace in the residence of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a criminal investigation report (No. 9, 10 pages of evidence), an investigation report (the attachment of on-site photographs, and evidence records No. 29 through 33 of evidence records);

1. Article 319 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 319 of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Article 186(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which committed the crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing, is deemed to have been committed on the following grounds: (a) the elderly victim and his/her father, who tried to take the entrance of the victim by force; (b) however, (c) the victim was forced to take the door down; (d) the window installed on the window that did not take place as intended; (d) the window was boomed by tearing, huming, huming, huming, and spiting, so the crime is bad; (e) the Defendant did not agree with the victim; and (e) the Defendant did not endeavor to recover the damage; and (e) the Defendant did not seem to be contrary