However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On June 3, 2014, at around 22:08, the Defendant driven the said cknife while under the influence of alcohol by 0.165%, while driving the said cknife at a level of 0.165%, and led to the course of the intersection of the front private distance of the E pharmacy D at netcheon-si bypassing from the side of the National Bank to the speed of 50km per hour in accordance with the two-lanes between the three-lanes.

At all times, the center line of yellow solid lines was installed at night, and in this case, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by reducing speed and not breaking the center line by checking well the right and the right of the person engaged in driving business.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was negligent in driving the center line over the center line, resulting in the victim's GF driver's GF driver's vehicle driving in the opposite direction to the Defendant's moving direction. On the other hand, the Defendant continued to receive the victim's H (36 years old) driver's I driver's driving in the same direction as the above free car.

As a result, the Defendant: (a) by occupational negligence as above, injured the victim H of cerebral sugars, etc. in need of two weeks’ medical treatment; (b) knenee’s infeasia’s infeasia and kne’s infeasia’s infeasia’s infeasia and kne’s infasia’s infeasia, etc. in need of two weeks’ medical treatment; and (c) feasia’s infasia and tensions in need of two weeks’ treatment; and (d) feasia’s infeasia’s infeasia’s infeasia and fasia’s infasia’s infasia; and (d) feasia’s infasia’s infeasia, etc.,

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement of H;

1. The actual condition of traffic accidents (1) (2).