When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

피고인은 2015. 5. 14. 23:00경 대구 동구 B에 있는 ‘C’ 식당에서 “술에 취한 사람이 바닥에 누워 소리를 지르는 등 소란을 피우고 있다.”는 112 신고를 받고 출동한 대구동부경찰서 D지구대 소속 경장 E로부터 귀가할 것을 권유받자 화가나 “야! 이 씨발놈아! 이 짭새 새끼야!”라고 욕설을 하고, 발로 위 E의 다리를 여러 차례 걷어찼다.

After being notified from E that the Defendant may be arrested as an offender in the act of committing an offense under the suspicion of obstruction of performance of official duties, the Defendant saw him out of the above restaurant, and tried to see the above E as follows: “I am kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn kn

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to the prevention, suppression and investigation of police officers' crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement to F and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes for reporting internal accidents;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order include: (a) the Defendant’s late and reflects his mistake; (b) the Defendant has no record of the same kind of crime; and (c) the motive, background, means and methods of the instant crime; (d) circumstances before and after the instant crime; and (e) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, career, and environment as shown in the argument in the instant case.