beta
(영문) 청주지방법원 2013.12.20 2013고단1398

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

The defendant shall pay KRW 1,560,000 to an applicant for compensation.

3.2

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 11, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of ten months at the Cheongju District Court for a crime of fraud. On June 10, 201, the Defendant was released from parole on July 30, 2012 during the execution of the said suspended sentence after having been sentenced to one year of imprisonment for a crime of fraud at the same court on June 10, 201.

[2013 Highest 1398]

1. On April 30, 2013, the Defendant posted a notice to the effect that he would sell the said notice by accessing “D”, which is a used goods transaction site via the Internet, at an insular place located in Cheongju, and said that he would send the said camera if the communication from the victim E is transferred KRW 250,000 to the victim E.

However, the defendant only intended to acquire money through the ice of the transaction of goods and did not have the intention or ability to sell the goods.

The Defendant, from April 17, 2013, received 250,000 won from the victim E to the national bank account in the name of the Defendant, and the same year from around April 17, 2013.

9. From September to September, by deceiving the victims on the trading sites of used goods, such as “F”, “G”, and “D” by the aforementioned methods, and by receiving a total of KRW 28,850,50,000 through the above account, etc. as shown in the attached list of crimes, and acquired it by defrauded.

[2013 Highest 1526]

2. Around August 5, 2013, the Defendant sent a message to the victim I, who posted a letter “F” on the Internet site of “F” at the Defendant’s residence located in a reasonable district of Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, stating that “I wish to purchase a unit-based gift certificate” will send two copies of “I will receive a unit-based ticket if you receive a deposit.”

However, since the defendant did not hold the above warranty admission ticket at the time, even if he received the payment from the victim I, he did not have the intention or ability to issue the warranty admission ticket.

The defendant belongs to this.