2. Examining the degree of the Defendant’s participation in the assembly and demonstration of this case, the time and degree of interference with general traffic in this case, the records of the Defendant’s punishment for the same kind of crime, the Defendant’s health and economic situation, and other circumstances shown in the records and arguments of this case, including the Defendant’s age, career, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., the lower court’s sentencing is determined within a reasonable and reasonable scope, and is not deemed unreasonable or unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant and the prosecutor's argument are not accepted.

3. The appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor in conclusion is groundless, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.