A. Facts of recognition 1) D is the E-city bus around 23:50 on May 6, 2013 (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).

(i) by driving a G station in front of the G station located in the Glux in the Glux in the Glux of the Glux of the Glux of the Glux of the Glux of the Glux of the Glux of the Glux of the Glux of the Glux of the Glux of the Glux of the Glux of the Glux of the Glux of the Glux of the Glux of the Glux of the Glux of the Glux of the Glux of the Glux of the G

) The driver’s IOba (hereinafter “Plaintiff Oba”) is called “Plaintiff Oba”.

) Without discovering the U.S., the front part of the Defendant vehicle was shocked by the front part of the Plaintiff Ortoba, thereby causing the death of the deceased (hereinafter “instant accident”).

(2) Plaintiff A and C are punished by the Deceased, Plaintiff B is the deceased, and the Defendant is a mutual aid contractor who entered into a mutual aid agreement with respect to the Defendant’s vehicle.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5, 8, 10 through 12, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 3 (including additional numbers), the fact-finding results on the Director of the Traffic Accident Appraisal Board of this Court, the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the fact of recognition of liability, the defendant is liable for damages suffered by the plaintiffs, who are the deceased and their bereaved family members, as mutual aid business operators of the defendant vehicle.

C. The defendant asserts that since the accident of this case occurred due to the total negligence of the deceased who was frighting in the central line at night, the driver of the defendant vehicle must be exempted from liability.

In general, it is common for the vehicle driver who operates a road with a central line installed along his own lane to trust the vehicle to be operated along the upper line. Therefore, the other party is obliged to take special measures by forecasting the center line of the road until it reaches the center line.