However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On April 26, 2018, from around 12:30 to 14:50 on April 26, 2018, the Defendant interfered with the victim C’s operation of the restaurant by force, such as taking the other restaurant users at the restaurant with a large interest or speaking in a threatening manner.

2. The Defendant, on April 26, 2018, does not pay money to the victim E and the victim F, who is the police officer belonging to the police police box of Jung-Eup Police Station called up after receiving 112 reports at a restaurant on April 14:50 at around 16, 2018 as stated in paragraph (1).

이 씨 발 좃 같은 놈 아. 너 거들 다 죽었다.

Magnis Police Prosecution도요

The excreta seems to be only the processed matter.

Whether a bribe has been received

The victims were openly insultingd, among many persons who run a restaurant, such as 'a large studio', and the surrounding areas of C and their places.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to victims E and F;

1. A written statement of the victim C;

1. Complaint;

1. A report on internal investigation:

1. On-site photographs;

1. 112 Reporting case handling table;

1. Application of investigation reports (related Acts and subordinate statutes, such as victims C and telephone calls, and intent to punish such women);

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. The aggravated punishment for concurrent crimes under the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (aggravating concurrent crimes within the scope of the sum of the long-term punishment for each crime);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of the protection and observation of the community service order and the order to provide community service, and Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act committed on the grounds of the sentencing of the defendant: (a) prevents the defendant from coming to the restaurant and let the customers go with the trial expenses, or failing to comply with the demand to leave the restaurant; (b) interfere with the business by the method of unfolding around the table and failing to comply with the demand to leave; and (c) insulting the police officers dispatched upon receiving 112 report by taking serious humiliation and insulting the victim; and (d) thereby, the details and mode of the offense and the victims therefrom.