Where a defendant fails to pay a fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

피고인은 2019. 6. 7. 04:50경 창원시 의창구 B에 있는 ‘C’ 내에서 “술값을 주지 않고 병을 깨고 소란을 피운다”는 위 가게 업주 D의 112신고를 받고 출동한 창원서부경찰서 E파출소 소속 경위 F, 경사 G으로부터 “술값을 지급하고 귀가하세요”라는 말을 듣자, “씨발, 짭새새끼들, 너거들이 먼데 ”라고 욕설을 하며 양손으로 경사 G을 2회 밀치고, 경사 G의 멱살을 잡는 등 폭행을 하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on handling 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Protocol of the police statement concerning G;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. On the grounds of sentencing under Article 334 of the Criminal Procedure Act, the sentence shall be determined as ordered in full view of all the various circumstances, including the following circumstances and the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime.

Unfavorable circumstances: The offense committed against the police officers is inferior to the quality of the offense, the circumstances favorable to the recovery of damage, etc.: The defendant repents and reflects the wrong, and the first offense, etc.