(a) Indication of claims: To be as shown in the reasons for the claims;

(b) Applicable legal provisions: Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act (Decision by public notice);

2. Determination as to the claim against the defendant Sejong Industrial Complex

A. According to the purport of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 12 and the entire arguments, the defendant corporation, Dongyang-type Co., Ltd. entered into three loan agreements as stated in paragraph (1) of the attached Table No. 1 with the plaintiff. The above three loans were concluded by the extension of due date each year until February 2011, and each extension by November 23, 201 and March 30, 2012, as stated in paragraph (1) of the attached Table No. 1, respectively. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 23577, Mar. 19, 2012; Presidential Decree No. 23584, Feb. 2, 2017; Presidential Decree No. 24475, Feb. 2, 2017; Presidential Decree No. 24475, Feb. 2, 2017; Presidential Decree No. 24470, Mar. 27, 2012>

나. 상법 규정 ◆제530조의9(분할 및 분할합병 후의 회사의 책임) ① 분할회사, 단순분할신설회사, 분할승계회사 또는 분할합병신설회사는 분할 또는 분할합병 전의 분할회사 채무에 관하여 연대하여 변제할 책임이 있다.

(2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), where a divided company incorporates a company by a resolution passed under Article 530-3 (2), a company newly incorporated by a simple division may determine that it bears only the responsibility for the obligations determined to be succeeded to in the plan for division among the obligations of the divided company.

In such cases, the divided company shall continue to exist after the division.