However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On November 13, 2016, at around 21:20, the Defendant was drunk in front of the D Mart parking lot located in Kimhae-si, Kimhae-si, and the police officer belonging to the E police station in the Kimhae-si, who was called the 112 notification order, she was able to shot the Defendant and shot the Defendant, and the Defendant was able to shot the Defendant, and the Defendant was shot F, who called the “F shotf shotf shotf shotf shotf shotf, shotf shotf shotf shotf shotf shotf shotf shotf shotf shotf shotf shotfs at the hand of the Defendant.”

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted police officers and interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reported cases by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

Application of the police statement law to F of the defendant's legal statement F

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment.

2. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that there is no criminal conviction or heavier for the suspension of execution and that there is a penance);