beta
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2014.10.22 2014고정216

사문서위조등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Around July 17, 2011, the Defendant maintained a de facto marriage relationship without reporting the marriage with D. However, D, on or around May 24, 2012 on the grounds of the Defendant’s suspicion, etc., decided to liquidate a de facto marriage relationship with the Defendant and notified the Defendant of the aforementioned purport, and left the residence of Songpa-gu Seoul E Apartment 101 Dong 503, Songpa-gu, Seoul, which was prepared for a marriage life with the Defendant.

1. On June 29, 2012, the Defendant forged a marriage report in the name of D, which is a private document related to rights and obligations, with the intention of using D’s seal affixed to D’s name, and forged a one copy of D’s marriage report in the name, which is a private document related to D’s rights and obligations, with the intention of using D’s personal information written in the name column of the husband of the married party, using a black pen in the form of the marriage report that was kept there was no delegation of the authority from D to delegate the authority to report the marriage by the Songpa-gu Seoul Songpa-gu Office of Civil Service, Songpa-gu, Seoul. Around June 29, 2012, the Defendant: (a) stated D’s name in the name column of the husband; (b) stated D’s resident registration number “F” and address column “F” in the name of the contracting party; and (c) exercised the same as if the name of the Songpa-gu office could not be known.

2. The Defendant submitted a false entry in the original of a notarial deed and a false entry in the original of a notarial deed at the time, place, and the above public official submitted a forged marriage report as mentioned above, and had the said public official enter false facts in the family relation register, which is the original of the notarial deed, and exercised by having the said public official keep the family relation register, which is the original of the notarial

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. A copy of the letter;

1. Copy of the basic certificate, etc.;

1. Application of the law of the judgment.