beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 2013.09.06 2012가단213496

임금

Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) 17,808,220 won and a rate of 20% per annum from July 2, 2013 to the date of complete payment.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On September 7, 201, when the Plaintiff worked at the Daegu Motor Vehicle Office of the Defendant Construction Corporation, the Plaintiff sustained the injury from the contact with other trains, which was cut around the left elbow.

B. The Plaintiff filed an application for medical care due to an occupational accident with the Korea Workers’ Compensation and Welfare Service, and received recognition of an occupational accident, and provided additional medical care from September 7, 201 to April 22, 2012, and applied for extension of the period of medical care for the terminated period, and provided additional medical care until August 10, 2012.

C. From September 8, 2011 to March 5, 2012, the Defendant Corporation dealt with the Plaintiff’s occupational disease. From March 6, 2012 to April 30, 2012, the Defendant Corporation issued a leave of absence from office for occupational illness. From May 1, 2012 to July 10, 2012, and from July 11, 2012 to August 10, 2012, the Defendant Corporation extended each of the above leave of absence from office for occupational disease.

Since then, the Plaintiff appears to be adequate to avoid any labor or activity that currently uses the left-hand check due to the suspension of the front-hand part of the annual installments, the deficit of the organization, the left-hand check-up to the left-hand check-up. It is necessary to continue rehabilitation treatment and to observe the progress in the future. The Plaintiff applied for the extension of the period of leave of absence to Defendant Corporation by attaching a medical certificate stating that the period of leave of absence is about 12 months: the Defendant issued a general disease suspension order against the Plaintiff from August 11, 2012 to August 10, 2013.

E. The Plaintiff, even at present, has a fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluor, and fluoral fluordg fluordg fluordg flus fluordg fluorg flus fluor, and it is difficult to engage in the Plaintiff’