However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On November 22, 2017, around November 22, 2017, at the “E” store located in Yongsan-gu Seoul, Yongsan-gu, Seoul around November 17:05, the Defendant: (a) entered one point of KRW 130,00 of the market price of the victim F, who is his/her employee, ever placed in the seat of the seat transport; (b) sustained one point of KRW 120,000 of the market price of the victim G, who is his/her employee, continuously placed in the seat transfer; and (c) took one point of KRW 120,000 of the market price of the victim G, who is his/her employee, placed in the seat transfer; and (d) stolen it from the said store by inserting it into the inner part of the Defendant’s occupant.

2. On December 5, 2017, around 19:43, 2017, around December 5, 2017, in front of the “JJ operated by the victim I in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government,” the Defendant: (a) committed larceny by putting two door boxes containing one male pocketet in the market value equivalent to KRW 27,000, the market value of the victim’s possession, which was locked in front of the entrance, in order to send his/her house; and (b) one unit of a sports clothes in the market value of KRW 21,00,000, respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the accused;

1. A written statement of each victim in the F and G preparation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the I Statement;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act: A sentence that is lower than the lower limit of the sentencing guidelines (6 months to June 1) shall be imposed on the grounds of the sentencing guidelines, taking into account all the circumstances, such as the defendant's age, sex, criminal conduct, career, home environment, motive for committing a crime, and circumstances that make the sentencing conditions specified in the argument of this case, although the defendant had been punished for the same kind of crime, and the amount of damage is not so significant that the defendant committed the crime of this case is returned.