However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person engaged in driving a observer car B.

On March 12, 2019, the Defendant driven the said car on March 12, 2019, and driven the said car along the three-lane distance of 57-32, a school-free distance of 57-32, Seosung-gu, Daejeon, Seosung-gu, Daejeon, along the one-lane distance from the intersection of the Trisan-gu.

Since there is an intersection where signal lights are installed, the driver of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to check whether the driver of the motor vehicle has a motor vehicle, etc. to reduce speed and cross-section the front left well, to accurately operate the steering gear and brake system, and to prevent the accident by safely driving according to the traffic signal in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and continued the vehicle stop signal while disregarding and continuing it, and due to the vehicle progress signal, the part of the victim D(43 years old) driving, which was left behind the left side of the vehicle of the victim D(43 years old), was taken into account as the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury, such as a closed duplicating duplicating, including two lupages that require approximately five weeks of medical treatment from the above occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of police statement made in D;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. An accident site photograph;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3 (1) and proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, the selection of imprisonment without prison labor;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act is that the defendant was punished for the same kind of crime, such as the violation of the Road Traffic Act even before the order to attend a lecture or the order to provide community service.

The defendant's negligence of neglecting the duty of front-time care on the new wall causes the shock of another person's vehicle.