In light of the period during which the Defendant saw the face of the victim (at least 20 years of age) who walks on the way without any justifiable reason at night, it appears that the victim had suffered considerable shock in light of the time when the assault was committed, and the gender and age of the Defendant and the victim. Nevertheless, it is difficult to see that the Defendant was seriously opposed to his mistake, such as giving an instruction to the victim about political matters, and scambling him about his face, and scambling that he would cause losses to the face of the victim, etc. Therefore, taking account of various sentencing conditions as shown in the argument of the instant case, such as the method of the instant crime, background and circumstance of the crime, circumstances after the crime, the age and character of the Defendant, and the degree of property, etc., the punishment of the lower judgment is unreasonable. Thus, the Defendant’s assertion is groundless.

Therefore, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.